Google blues

Photo prompt © Ayr/Gray

Google blues

I’m on time. I check the address.  All good. But where is he?

‘Don’t be late,’ he said. ‘I only have an hour and you know how you … ‘

‘Yes, I know,’ I replied, my tone somewhat terse, as I recall. ‘Congenitally tardy’—that’s what he called me, and I couldn’t argue. Already he’s discovered my glaring inadequacy. Well, I’m here. But where is he?

I don’t panic. I wander/pace, studying my surroundings. He’s also noticed my other big under-achievement. ‘Don’t you observe anything? Didn’t you see that bridge/bird/building?’ 

Building—I’ll pay attention, and tell him everything I’ve observed while I waited. This building—empty/deserted. Forlorn, as though falling into depression/despondency—I mean disrepair. There’s a sign. Ha! French! Come on Google Translate, give me something impressive. I’ll show him who’s observant. And on time.

And Google says I’m waiting outside a howl mill. That can’t be right. Scroll further. Ah, that’s for animals. Animals howl. But a howl mill? 

For humans—‘scream or yell’. No help there.

Before I yell/scream/howl he arrives. I tell him about my observations when he finishes apologising for his ‘tardiness’. 

‘It’s fine,’ I coo, generous in my understanding. ‘And guess what this building is? I’ve been observing it.’

So now he also knows how bad my spelling is. 

‘It’s an oil mill. ’Huile’, not ‘hurle’,’ he explains, somewhat patronisingly, but I overlook it.

‘Hurle’ also means ‘clash’—when it’s colours—I’m thinking, as we move away, not holding hands.

***

250 words for The Unicorn Challenge, hosted by Jenne Gray and C.E. Ayr.

Apologies to competent French speakers for any and all errors here. I had to rely on Google :-).

13 thoughts on “Google blues

  1. Great use of the prompt picture, Margaret.
    And I love your protagonist – with whom I share many traits!
    Favourite sentence: “‘It’s fine,’ I coo, generous in my understanding.”😉
    There’s only so often one can ‘understand’ and ‘overlook’ though.
    I see the understanding has cooled a bit by the end.
    Thank goodness, because I really wanted to give him a slap and shout ‘Believe in yourself, girl!’
    Complete, living characters portrayed in so few words – you have the knack.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I share some of those traits too, Jenne. I’m glad you liked the ending. I had to leave her with some hope for a more self-confident future. Thanks for your great comment. You’re very kind.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. what a roger*

    I identified with your protagonist.

    Odd compliment: the character is drawn in such a way as to inspire reactions to the story such as, ‘She should tell him to…’ or ‘She needs to dump the loser but not before she writes herself a note: ‘No matter what he says, it is not my fault.’

    *sorry, as impolite as muttering in a language not shared by others in my company… in our defense, complete agreement with the others as to the personality deficiencies exhibited by the ‘he’ in your story. (foregoing the label supporting character, as his type (of personality) would take offense. (lol… Doctrine joke).

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’m glad you read my narrator in such a way. Someone really needs to give her exactly the type of suggestions you mention. I think by the end she’s getting the picture herself, but will she be confident enough to follow it through? There’s no way to know for sure as her story ends here ☺️.

      You’re quite welcome to ‘mutter in a language not shared by others’ here on my blog, Clark. I like a challenge.

      Thank you for your interesting and kind comment, as always.

      Like

      • thanks (for the opportunity re: language) so as to not be unnecessarily cryptic, the term roger refers to one of the three personality types of the Wakefield Doctrine. (and, no, none of the three are all good or all bad). its just that, the way the guy chose to relate himself to your protag was so rogerian.) lol

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment